The Cyber Security People, Podcasts, & Feeds I Follow

Thisi a list cybersecurity people, news feeds, & podcasts I personally follow, I want to make something clear:

I follow these individuals, news feeds, and podcasts for their technical insight & not for their takes on politics, personal beliefs, or whatever else might pop up in their feed. People are complex, and following someone for their expertise in one area doesn’t mean endorsing all their views. If you don’t like how they butter their toast you don’t have to follow their advice on buttering toast.

The cybersecurity content space, especially on YouTube and social media, is full of grifters, hype machines, and snake-oil sellers. While I’m not aware of anyone on my list doing that, people change, sell out, or pivot to nonsense. If that happens, or someone can point to one of the people on this list doing that, I’ll remove them. My goal is to keep this list useful.

While not a perfect science here are the red flags :triangular_flag::triangular_flag:I look for when evaluating whether someone is legit or a grifter:

:money_bag: Overemphasis on Financial Gain

  • Constant sales pitches: Excessive focus on the monetary benefits of the course rather than the knowledge imparted.
  • Limited-time offers and scarcity tactics: Creating a sense of urgency to buy without providing substantial reasons. I feel it’s fine to put things on sale from time to time but the overly pushy way some do this make me really suspect.
  • Testimonials that seem too good to be true: Unrealistic claims of overnight success or life-changing transformations. Claims that people went from not knowing how to turn on a computer to make $200K in just one year in cybersecurity.

:chart_decreasing: Lack of Substantive Content

  • Vague or overly general promises: Broad claims about teaching “everything” without specifying the curriculum.

  • Focus on hype rather than information: Emphasizing the “coolness” or “excitement” of the subject matter over practical application. People over-hyping becoming a hacker or building a SaaS APP in 24hrs is also just annoying.

  • Reliance on clickbait and sensationalism: Using attention-grabbing titles or images without relevant content. Click interesting is fine provided they deliver on their claims.

:man_detective: Shady or Inflated Credentials and Lack of Social Proof

  • Vague Background: Does not really go in depth about how they got into their career, they tend to talk around it but never any real detail
  • Claims Job was Classified: These people are particularly Infuriating. They love alleging having done Gov work but then claim all the amazing things they are classified and you will have to trust just how awesome and important they are.
  • Advisory Board Seat: As someone who has participated and currently is on several advisory boards, I can say for certain it’s not that hard to get a position on one. Lots of companies do like having a board on people working in the industry offering insights which sometimes leads to companies letting almost anyone on. The useless people will usually get tossed off the board for not contributing but will forever tout the fact they were on the board as why you should buy from them.

While not all people who engage in any of these things are automatically grifters, I feel comfortable saying that all grifters I have encountered engage in many of these tactics.


:headphone:Podcasts


:newspaper: My OPML File from my RSS Reader FreshRSS

It’s on GitHub to make it easier for me to update and has a mix of security and tech news


:globe_with_meridians: Social Media Feeds


You can also share this via my short URL https://lawrence.video/cybernews

2 Likes