What is the general consensus of which antivirus to use at home?
Avast? LOVED it until they started adding adds for their own software in it even if you purchased any version of it. But that’s not to say its not good or bad.
McAfee… just ewwwww.
Norton WAS good to me until it started becoming a resource hog… oh about 2006ish?
As for any others I have heard of, I have never tried.
The built in Windows Defender Antivirus is actually quite good. My friends who do malware testing lately have mentioned a few times that they could bypass the enterprise AV system but Windows would stop the virus deployments.
I agree there but have heard ALWAYS don’t just trust Windows defender. At lease have something to do an additional scan every now and then. I am only currently using windows defender on everything behind pfsense, pfblocker and suricata. I have my oinkmaster code installed in suricata and also have the other blocking options enabled there. Pfblocker running with GEOip and have my feeds setup with shallalist and UT1 and am quite amazed at what that in itself blocks from other countries. Quite good i must say but there is always something out there to get through no matter what you have.
Blocking USBs in BIOS is a hassle. Nice thing about using software such as AVAST or SOPHOS is you can disable the block and allow certain people to use the usb ports on demand without having to go into bios.
I’ve been using ESET for the last few years after swapping away from Norton and have really liked it.
It’s lightweight and doesn’t get in my way unless it’s actually an important notification.
This is my pick for AV currently, too. I’ve used them for years, and I’ve had good experience with their detections and interoperability. I’m in the process of spinning up a malware analysis lab. I’d like to do some independent testing and analysis. There’s a lot of advertising out there, and a lot of inherent trust around AV detections and responses. I think it would be good to validate it with some research.